Spelling instruction has fallen in and out of favor over the years. This has often resulted from concerns about whether spelling lessons have any benefit for students. When spelling is taught in ways that emphasize the patterns of the English language, it can be a beneficial use of class time.
Words matter – Three Approaches for Spelling Word Lists
Learning Spelling Patterns Amid Some Exceptions
The most common approach to teaching spelling is to use thematic lists (such as List A) or leveled lists (such as List B). These might seem appealing because they can be connected to vocabulary lessons. However, they make spelling seem arbitrary and reinforce the erroneous notion that the only way to learn to spell is to memorize the words. In addition, students would be challenged to learn the meanings of the words at the same time they are learning how to spell them. It is better for students to work on spelling words that are already in their oral vocabularies or that are about two grade levels below their current reading level. These words should be chosen to reinforce a pattern in order to emphasize the rule-based nature of the language. The words in List C above demonstrate the patterns for forming the /k/ sound. There are specific letter sequences that dictate when the sound is spelled with a “c,” a “k,” or the digraph “ck.”
Rather than memorizing individual words that seem to represent the same sound unpredictably, students should learn the patterns for spelling the sounds in words. These patterns are largely consistent, but there are exceptions. For example, the /k/ sound is sometimes spelled with “ch” (monarch, school), “qu” (mosquito, unique), or with only a “c” or “k” in the final position (attic, trek). Exceptions should be treated as opportunities to discuss the different influences on our language such as other languages and word origins. In some cases, the exceptions can be explained by the combination of prefixes, roots, and suffixes. But even if the exceptions have to be memorized by students, they are far fewer than the number of words that conform to the spelling rule.
The issue is not if spelling should be taught. The issue is whether or not spelling instruction is implemented effectively—by reinforcing the patterns in the language.